I wanted my LinkedIn outbound handled without gambling my account on it. So I built this.

What the agents do

Six jobs, run every day on your behalf. None of them is a chat window you have to prompt.

Reads your product page, writes your ICP

Five to eight exact LinkedIn job titles, your positioning, three angles and a sample note. It is a text box, not a black box — you edit whatever it got wrong.

Finds up to 25 matching people a day

From a title search, and — warmer — from the people who commented under a competitor's post this week or wrote one about the problem you solve. Each one arrives with the reason they were picked, not a bare number you are asked to trust.

Writes one message per person

From that person's actual profile. A draft too close to a recent one is thrown away and rewritten, so no two people get the same note with the name swapped.

Sends from your own account, on a schedule you can read

Who, at what time, under which cap — visible before it happens, not after. Inside your working hours, at irregular gaps, one follow-up.

Handles the replies

Every answer lands in one inbox and instantly cancels everything still queued for that person. Nobody who replied gets chased.

Watches the account while it works

Acceptance rate, LinkedIn's own pushback, connection count. It slows itself down or stops before the platform does it for you.

Why these get answered

Outbound converts on whether the message reads like a person wrote it to you, and on whether it arrives at all. Both are things software can get wrong at scale, so both are handled deliberately.

Written for the person, not merged

The angle comes from what they do and what you sell. Near-duplicates are detected and regenerated — the cheapest thing for anyone to spot is the same note a hundred times.

One follow-up. Not five.

A single follow-up roughly doubles replies. The third and fourth add almost nothing except complaints. There is no setting to add more.

Arrives like a human sent it

Your account, your working hours, one fixed location, irregular gaps. Twenty invitations exactly three minutes apart is what a bot looks like.

Volume is not the lever

Twenty invitations that land beat four hundred that get the account restricted. A restricted account replies at zero, and it is your account, not ours.

Setting it up takes about ten minutes

1. 1
   Paste your product page — free, no card

   It is read and turned into your ideal-customer profile: who to look for, three angles, and one real note written to a real persona. Edit anything. If what it writes about your market is wrong, you have learned that for nothing and you should not buy this.

2. 2
   Subscribe — $49/month, cancel whenever

   This is where the card comes in, and it is deliberately before LinkedIn rather than after: connecting an account is the first thing that costs me money, so it is the first thing behind the paywall. Cancel any time and the queue stops the same day, and the first 14 days are refunded in full if it was not for you. There is no free trial because the trial is the ICP you already read.

3. 3
   Connect LinkedIn

   You sign in on LinkedIn's own page. Your password and 2FA code never reach us — we hold an opaque account id and nothing else. You will need 150+ existing connections; we ask before taking your money, because below that we will refuse to send at all.

4. 4
   Read your first queue, about a minute later

   25 matched people, each with a message already written for them, from their own profile. Skip anyone. Edit anything. Nothing has been sent.

5. 5
   Approve three, and it starts

   There is no switch to find and no waiting period. Approving is the go-ahead, and it is asked for every message, for ever — five a day at first, building to 20 over three weeks. Replies land in your inbox; a weekly summary tells you what happened, including the weeks when nothing did.

What a first month actually adds up to

Somebody reading “20 invitations a day” has to work out for themselves whether that is worth $49/month, and mostly nobody does. So here it is worked out. These figures are generated from the same ramp the sender obeys, not typed in — if the cap changes, this paragraph changes with it.

About 270 invitations in four weeks

Five a day for three days, then ten, fifteen, eighteen, 20 — weekdays only, under a rolling ceiling of 80 a week. On a free LinkedIn account it is about 180, because the weekly ceiling there is 50.

Which is roughly 68–81 new connections

At a 25–30% accept rate, the band our circuit breaker is calibrated against. Below 15% it halves your caps on its own, because that is the number LinkedIn watches too. Each of those people gets one message written for them, and one follow-up.

How many reply is down to your offer

Not to this software, and I am not going to invent a number for it. Anyone quoting you a reply rate before seeing what you sell is quoting you a number they made up.

Whether that is worth it is arithmetic you can do

A year of this costs $588. You know what one customer is worth to you, and I do not, so that is the whole calculation. If it does not clear the bar, do not buy it — and if a month of it teaches you that your positioning is wrong, you found that out for $49 instead of for three months of your own evenings.

These are ceilings, not forecasts. Public holidays, a week you approve nothing, or the accept-rate breaker throttling you all make the real number smaller. Nothing makes it bigger — that is the whole design.

Who this is wrong for

If you want a few hundred invitations a week, this is the wrong product and you should not buy it. If you have a sales team and a CRM to integrate with, it is too small for you. If you have fewer than 150 LinkedIn connections, it will refuse to send for you and you should come back later. It is built for one founder who wants their own outbound handled, and who would rather have it running a year from now than send four hundred invitations this month and lose the account.

The limits the agents run under

Published in full. Most of this category says “human-like limits” and stops there; one competitor publishes a daily figure in a blog post. LinkedIn does not state its limits and restricts accounts that cross them, so we took the highest figures anyone credibly reports and set ours three to five times below them. These are constants in the source. You cannot raise them, and neither can we.

20 invitations a day, maximum

And you cannot raise it. Neither can we — it is a constant in the code, not a setting.

A three-week warm-up ramp

Five a day, then ten, fifteen, eighteen, twenty. A brand-new account behaving like an old one is the clearest signal there is.

Never at the edges of your day

We stay twenty minutes clear of both ends of your working hours, skip weekends, and know the public holidays where you are.

Requires 150+ existing connections

A near-empty profile sending invitations is the pattern LinkedIn most reliably restricts. We will hold your account back rather than risk it.

Any reply stops everything

The moment somebody answers, every queued message for them is cancelled. Nothing circles back at a person who already replied.

We stop before LinkedIn does

If your acceptance rate falls below 15% we halve your caps; below 8% we stop inviting and tell you. A low accept rate is what precedes a restriction.

Watched from day four, not day ten

Judging an accept rate properly needs invitations a week old — by which point a bad account has sent a hundred. So a second, blunter check runs on ten invitations three days old, and stops everything if none of them landed.

One strike in the first day and we stop

If LinkedIn so much as checkpoints your account in its first 24 hours of sending, we turn sending off and leave it off until you say otherwise. No automatic retry, no matter how good the numbers look afterwards.

Rather talk to someone first?

Thirty minutes with the person who built it. No demo script — bring your product page and you will get a straight answer about whether this is the wrong tool for you.